3 Comments
author

Well, it is interesting. According to reporting in the New York Times, one of the reasons federal prosecutors would not bring a case against Trump was because they considered Michael Kamen to be an unreliable witness. As part of his plea deal he was supposed tWell, it is interesting. According to reporting in the New York Times, one of the reasons federal prosecutors would not bring a case against Trump was because they considered Michael Kamen to be a unreliable witness. As part of his plea deal, he was supposed to discuss the full breath of his criminal activity with Trump, but would not.

Expand full comment

It will not matter if the prosecution brings in David Pecker to testify about the Susan MacDougal payoff that preceded stormy Daniels. Some legal experts that I have read believe that this helps corroborate Michael Cohens testimony that there was a pattern of Trump trying to cover his tracks before the 2016 election. Surely you have read the opinions of these experts too.

Expand full comment

I disagree. If Michael Cohen was convicted in this case then why not the mastermind - Donald Trump? Besides, this is just the beginning of indictments for Trump - most assuredly for Mar a Lago so not worth debating this particular crime.

Expand full comment